The Evolving Nature of Deterrence in a Tripolar World
The recent War on the Rocks article "The Challenge of Tripolar Arms Competition" provides some thought-provoking insights into the changing nature of strategic deterrence in a world with three major military powers - the US, China, and Russia. If you are a researcher or student of deterrence, and are interested in exploring this topic further, here are three key ideas to consider:
Deterrence is becoming more complex. During the Cold War, deterrence was based on the US-Soviet bipolar system. Now with three major powers, deterrence requires balancing multiple adversarial relationships simultaneously. This makes signaling intent and maintaining strategic stability more difficult.
Arms control is harder but still necessary. With more players at the table, reaching mutually acceptable arms control deals is more challenging. But they are still needed to manage risky arms buildups and reduce miscalculation. Creative thinking is required to craft agreements that address each nation's core interests.
New domains like space and cyberspace complicate deterrence. The space and cyber domains lack norms and rules. Misunderstandings and misperceptions could too easily escalate without guardrails. Explicit deterrence strategies for these domains are needed, along with arms control pacts.
Interested in writing a book on deterrence? We'd love to hear your thoughts and ideas on how to translate these insights into a compelling book. Please reach out to discuss partnering with KeyPoint Press to make your deterrence expertise accessible to a wide audience. The evolving multipolar landscape requires new thinking on this crucial strategic issue. Let's start a conversation.
Contact KeyPoint Press so we can discuss your idea for your next book project!
KeyPoint Press. Publishing Possibilities.
